Warning! This is not a good
news posting.
Anyone who follows Facebook,
Linkedin or Twitter links that cover wildlife issues cannot fail to have seen
the remarkable number of posts since December 1st about the utter
disaster that is going on across all African states where elephants are found.
Indeed, in some cases one can probably write where elephants used to roam. What a mess!
The news has gone well
beyond the social media scene and this scanned-in report in the Guardian, that I picked up in UK last week, may
have brought it to the attention of many others. Sadly that is very unlikely to make a jot of
difference to those who are engaged in the slaughter elephants and the use of
their teeth for human pleasure.
A really authoritative 19-page report by a team from three
main conservation groups (CITES Secretariat, IUCN / SSC African Elephant
Specialist Group and TRAFFIC International sums it up nicely.
It is titled: Status of African elephant populations and
levels of illegal killing and the illegal trade in ivory.
The report deals with the 2012 situation and a few
years prior. A key sentence in the
executive summary tells the sorry tale of the why?
"Poverty and weak
governance in elephant range States, together with demand for illegal ivory in
consuming nations, are the three key factors identified by repeated MIKE
analyses, including this one, as being most strongly associated with observed
poaching trends."
Of the many reports in
December 2013 that fit this picture I suppose the ones out of Tanzania are as
good an example as any. The Prime Minister Jakaya
Kikwete sacked four of his cabinet for what was reported as overzealous use
of control measures in the so-called Operation Tokomeza.
Within two days the operation was restarted after a
container load of ivory reputedly destined for China was seized at the Dar
es Salaam port.
Conniff’s post is either
terrifying or beggars belief. He states that “Apparently, managing the media
means keeping these results as quiet as possible.” So he quotes from none other than the
National Geographic
about the number of elephants in the Selous Game reserve alone. The latest, recently announced population
estimate is 13,084. This indicates an unprecedented decline of nearly 80
percent over the last six years. For the mathematically disinclined that is
a drop from 55,000 since 2007.
The numbers of elephants poached throughout Africa in
2012 are telling enough. The report, which is based on sound studies, gives an
estimate of some 15,000 animals but acknowledges that:
Monitoring of
elephant populations, apart from at a few well-monitored sites, is sporadic and
inconsistent. The low precision of most estimates makes it difficult to detect
any immediate repercussion on elephant numbers in the short-term but this does
not mean there are no changes.
That is just 2012. There are
no properly monitored figures for 2013, but none of the many claims gives a
figure lower than 25K. The most dire claim comes from the International Fund for Animals Welfare who suggest that up to
“50,000 elephants a year are now being slaughtered.” In this post on Dec 20
they stated that more than 41 tonnes of
elephant ivory have been seized in 2013, the largest quantity in 25 years.
Whether the
situation has really “shocked world
leaders out of their ennui and into action to halt poaching and ivory trafficking”
is real or hoped for is more questionable.
Other postings mention
numbers like 25 or 30,000 but all these numbers exceed any possible replacement
numbers and all are horrific. Of course the use of cyanide at salt licks is nasty,
but the wholesale mowing down of the sentient, intelligent creatures with
automatic weapons is probably nastier. In the cyanide case, the affected
animals will have died quickly and probably known little of what was happening
to their herd mates. With a hail of bullets smashing into bone, lungs, hearts
and brains many of the elephants will have been very well aware of what was
happening.
Having written this last
paragraph from the heart I am horrified to think that I could opine that
cyanide was a better way to die than by gunfire.
At the other end of the trade
chain a Dec 22 post from the South China
Morning Post makes it clear that the Chinese do not seem to share the
opinion of the Kenyans.
“It is way too lenient because Chinese people buying illicit ivory in Africa know that if they are caught, at most they will just lose the ivory and get a puny fine,” said Grace Ge Gabriel, Asia regional director for the International Fund for Animal Welfare.
“Tom Milliken, of the wildlife group TRAFFIC, said while he welcomed the jail term as a deterrent, fines could be written off as “the price of doing business”.”
He is probably right. Another
post of Dec 22, this one by Simon Parry tells us that the price of ivory in Hong Kong has
risen 50-fold in the last 10 years. Not surprisingly big tusks sell at a
premium. Parry gives an example of a 65kg pair of mounted tusks is on sale for
HK$15 million [almost US $ 2 million] at Chinese Arts and Crafts in Wan
Chai.
As described in this post of
Dec 13 by Emily Matchar what the
rest of the world knows as illegal
ivory is called white gold in Hong Kong. With an increasingly wealthy Chinese middle class seeking
status symbols does the elephant have a chance? Then of course there are the 270 odd Chinese billionaires (that
is not a typo; It is B, not M).
I could go on, as I have only
mentioned a small proportion of the December posts, but this one should give
some flavour to those who have not been following the situation closely. Anyway,
I have just gone over my one thousand word limit.
No comments:
Post a Comment